Tuesday, July 17, 2018

Let the Jury Decide

Dear Readers,

Hey! Stop shouting! Don’t you know we’re trying to hibernate down here?

It’s mid-2018, and you people are bellowing at each other about Takoma Junction louder than when we bedded down in the bunker a year and a half ago.

If more of you had read this column from 2014 to 2017 when the development process unfolded, you wouldn’t be at each other’s throats. And you’d have your facts straight!

All About You

We covered the Takoma Park city council for about a dozen years, so we’ve observed patterns - YOUR patterns, dear city resident. We've got better algorithms on you than Facebook!

First you elect perfectly normal, good neighbors like yourself to the city council. It’s a lousy, tedious job you elect these people to do. You trust them to follow complicated details of city government. You trust they will deal with issues the way YOU would - if you had the time and interest to learn the fine details.

Then an issue comes before the council that catches your attention. Of the scores, hundreds or thousands of details involved in this issue, a handful of facts - by themselves - are alarming. Maybe you get an e-mail about it, or it comes by word of mouth. Maybe a flyer gets slipped into your grocery bag.

Your logic goes like this. 1) my councilmember, whom I elected in all trust, has all the facts. 2) I have a few facts that make this sound like a really bad idea, 3) THEREFORE: my councilmember is EVIL.

We said it was logic. We didn't say it was GOOD logic.

Break out the pitchforks and torches, storm the city council meeting! Wave your few facts like bloody shirts in their bewildered faces.

The councilmember may say “you don’t have all the facts, here are the rest of them,” but you are not to be denied your righteous indignation. Once you've decided that two or three facts are all you need to know, you dismiss the rest as “smoke and mirrors.”

We're not just referring to the Junction issue. This is ALL. THE. TIME. people. ALL. THE. FREEKIN'. TIME. 

Mother

The Takoma Junction development issue is Takoma Park’s Mother of all Issues. Thousands if not tens of thousands of facts are involved. And if you don’t know most of them, and if you didn’t see the process unfold, you are standing on quicksand when you voice an opinion based on just a few of the facts, especially facts handed to you by an interested third-party.

Here, dear readers, is the shortened, slightly edited version of what I wrote to your councilmembers, even the evil ones, on July 9.

Dear Councilmembers,
You are in the best position to make decisions on Takoma Junction, a better position than anyone else's.

In this case, the council is like a jury. You’ve seen all the evidence and heard all the testimony. The public has not. Aside from the stalwart Arthur David Olsen, no citizen has attended all the meetings, hearings, open houses and so forth. No citizen has complete information.
The public may have opinions, but an opinion based on incomplete information, misinformation or bias, is not useful. I urge you to gently discount such opinions, especially if it seems part of an orchestrated effort. 
I leave it up to you, I’m sure you’ll make the best informed decision.

Now you people just pipe down, please, so the council can get home at a reasonable hour - and so we can go back to hibernating!

But before we crawl back into the bunker, has anyone got a nightcap? We’re dying of thirst here.

Gilbert

PS. Granolapark is on its old blog.com site rather than the Takoma Voice, because, like Gilbert, the Voice is in hibernation, and its easier to do it this way. Enjoy the retro!

9 Comments:

Blogger Jim Douglas said...

Thank you. May you have 10,000 readers....

8:56 PM  
Blogger Edge said...

Bravo!

9:46 PM  
Anonymous Tara said...

I missed you Gilbert!

9:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A perfectly reasonable argument. Serving on the City Council is a thankless job, with ridiculous hours and pressures, and mere pennies in pay. Indeed, one reason we have the Council we have is because so few people are willing to run for office. So, yes, we are grateful to those who choose to serve.
I have two issues with your conclusion:
1) Our City Council members have no staff. They are 100 percent reliant on the City Manager and her staff. The City Manager and Community Development director have gone far beyond their authority as unelected officials to serve as overt policy makers and policy advocates for Takoma Junction. Brian Kenner initiated it and Suzanne Ludlow has followed in his path. The facts and information they use to analyze the Junction are largely what Ludlow feeds them.
2) I'm not willing to give my proxy to any group of elected officials -- not just my City Councilmembers but my county councilmembers, state legislators, governor, members of Congress or president -- to make whatever judgments they choose. I am going to weigh in with my opinions on any and every issue that matters to me. I am going to make my voice heard, because that is how democracy works. And if I disagree with them, I'm going to do it civilly -- but it's also going to inform what I do come election time.

10:04 PM  
Blogger Sue Immerman said...

Perfect. Thank you.

10:18 PM  
Blogger Alan Henney said...


Is the Gilbert blog back, hopefully?

11:54 PM  
Anonymous Gilbert said...

Anonymous, both of the two most recent city managers were chosen in a process involving massive public input. "We want someone who is one of us," was the majority point of view. There was even an almost-successful effort to insert language into the city charter that would require the city manager to live in the city. The general view of the departing city manager was (unfairly, in our view) that she disdained Takoma Park's progressive agenda and crunchy-granola lifestyle.

The city manager is the only city employee directly hired by, directly under the control of, and fired by the city council. If the city manager does stuff the council doesn't like, they can reprimand, re-direct or fire her or him.

So, you say this city manager, picked by they people, hired by the council, and duty-bound to do the council's bidding is manipulating the city council into making bad policy decisions?

How is it that you can see this from afar, but the seven residents we elected to do this work for us can't see it up close?

Gilbert

10:59 AM  
Blogger Sat Jiwan said...

Glad your back Gilbert. though maybe your more neutral half is still in hibernation. I also think you should acknowledge one council member among 7 is publicly against (though maybe not saying that the staff is unduly pushing this) and there may be another waivering member or two...

Facts are nice... council is not immune to spreading misinformation or hyperbole. And sometimes it isn't their fault. Maybe a staff report was mistaken but the meme went out anyway and got repeated by whoever's camp it served. One example: Councilmember Searcy did a pretty good job "selling" the project on Kojo Nnamdi show, but also traipsed into the land of exaggeration claiming the coop delivery trucks "use the ENTIRE lot to turn around" (her emphasis). Watching the video data.... yes they use up to 75% when it is open and there's no good reason to do a multi-point turn. they could easily work within 25% size, and probably smaller if constrained or asked too. I trust the drivers can overcome harder challenges than presented currently at the coop/city lot. (Layby yet to be determined....).

What is more disturbing is when/if claims are challenged and people are too dug in or invested to be able to step back and acknowledge errors, and take steps to clarifications.

More misinformation examples coming soon as Sat Jiwan ("truthful living") explores the depth of dissolution of the Junction Malfunction, Compunction, "Re"Function.... i'm still working on the branding.

3:35 AM  
Anonymous Susan Schreiber said...



Contrary to your assumption that citizens have not been attending Council meetings and lack critical information, many people raising concerns about the proposed development HAVE attended virtually all meetings where the proposed Junction development has been discussed. In addition to Council meetings, where a large number of residents have raised specific issues, from the size and scale of the current NDC plan to the impact on the Co-op to the contribution that the NDC plan will make to further gentrification or our diverse community. We have attended the City's open houses, "listening sessions" with Council members, we've met with council members and city staff individually. We have read through all of the information put out by City staff, and studied NDC's plan carefully, the traffic studies (see Roger Schlegel's careful analysis of the traffic studies, for example), the financial prospective put out by the City and local economist Michael Shuman's analysis, and the various alternative concepts for developing the lot.

While Gilbert has been on sabbatical, residents with a wide range of expertise have made statements during the public comment period and submitted testimony - including, just for example, 15 architects (all residents) whose letter reflected decades of experience working on development projects, 6 former City Council members, city planners, professional mediators, and an environmental scientist. A majority of businesses in the Junction, a number of which are minority owned, have raised concerns about the impact of the development on their businesses, noting that although promoting local businesses was one of the stated reasons for the development, at no time had they been contacted by the City to ask for their views or ideas about the development. Because there has been no town hall/facilitated process during which Council members would be asked to respond to the many concerns of residents, it is difficult to say how much of this information and expertise individual council members have absorbed. It's certainly true that they have spent a tremendous amount of time and energy during this long planning process, but it could also be said that based on what has transpired during Council work sessions, with one or two exceptions, members' desire to please the developer has outweighed their responsibilities to ask hard questions and make demands on a private developer who is about to be handed the the control of a key piece of PUBLIC LAND for the next 99 years.

So, Gilbert, please don't insult so many of your friends and neighbors by saying that they don't really know anything and should just let our elected representatives do their job.


1:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home